LETTERS FROM BIRMINGHAM

 

  Reports from the 217th General Assembly

  From Peter Nord, Executive Presbyter, Presbytery of Baltimore

 

    June 17, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

The pace of activity within the committees increased markedly today.

 

In the Peacemaking and International Affairs Committee and on the divestment front, Jack Sharp joined a couple of dozen overture advocates including the three previous moderators.  After hearing these advocates and various resource people, the committee went into a period of discernment with the hope that a consensus might develop.  As is the case in many of the committee rooms, the house was divided rather closely between those who wanted to maintain divestment and those who wished to modify the effort but keep up the pressure on all the parties.  Unfortunately, Jack had to leave for home before decisions were made by the committee.

 

In the Committee on Church Orders the twenty-some advocates who were seeking the removal of G-6.0106b joined together in a common and rather powerful presentation on Friday evening.  By Saturday afternoon, the committee had voted 30-28 to disapprove the Heartland Overture which would have removed this provision from the Book of Order.  The Committee the night before had voted to disapprove overtures which would have put greater restrictions on services for same sex-couples.

 

And the Ecclesiology Committee, which was by far the largest room with chairs for 500 and people standing along the walls, was well into its second day debating the Peace, Unity, and Purity Report.  An overture to remove recommendation #5 (which might be called the “scruples” provision) was made late in the afternoon.

 

In the midst of all this, a number of exec-types slipped out for a couple hours to see the 16th Street Baptist Church where four young girls were killed by a bomber in 1965 and to walk through the Birmingham Civil Rights Museum.  This museum is an extraordinary window into the struggle for civil rights and equality – in Birmingham, the country, and indeed the world.  Prominently displayed near a replica of the jail cell where Dr. King wrote his Letter from the Birmingham Jail was the letter from six community clergymen urging King to stop the demonstrations and live under the current laws until the legal and judicial processes were complete.  One wonders what kind of country we would be living in had their advice been followed.  Later I learned that others from Baltimore had gone off to Selma to consider the history of the civil rights movement in that community.

 

As evening approached some 17 Baltimoreans gathered for dinner and shared what was happening in their worlds.

 

Charles Forces, who advocated for an end on surcharges applied to ECO giving, found the overture being defeated – but not until lengthy debate and a variety of amendments were offered.  But in the end the committee voted to disapprove.

 

Bill Galvin also returned to Peacemaking Committee in time to see them approve Baltimore’s overture to use nationally our approach to non-violence training.  The support was unanimous.

 

Other folk reported that efforts to change the Presbyterian understanding regarding church property were not supported by the committee.  Efforts to speak far more strongly against late term abortions as well as abortions that are not related to preserving the health of the mother were also recommended to the Assembly.  The paper on the Trinity was passed with minor amendments along with a minority report.  A new hymnal (at least 8 years away) was also permitted.  A streamlined Chapter 14 in the Book of Order was encouraged and supported.  Hours of debate were held on the fate of the Montreat Historical Society.  While the committee wanted to compromise on Montreat, in the end it accepted the GAC recommendation that it be closed.

 

While most of the committees had completed their work by evening – some committees continued to be hard at it – Church Orders, General Assembly Procedures, Peacemaking (which has spent an extraordinary amount of time on Israel and Palestine), and Ecclesiology (which was engaged in debate on PUP).  As we approached the end of the night, Peacemaking had a proposal it was working on that seemed to soften the previous assembly actions and Ecclesiology had essentially supported the first four recommendations.  They had been working for hours on the fifth recommendation.  A motion to remove recommendation five was voted down 38 to 24.  A substitute motion was created and followed by a motion to recess and sleep on the decision.  This motion passed.

 

Upstairs in Peacemaking the perfecters of the motion were closing in on their decision.  In the end a motion was approved which calls for the replacement of the 2004 motion which initiated phased selective divestment.  The motion called upon us to make financial investments that promote peaceful pursuits and asked MRTI to ensure that its engagement is consistent with the following principles: reflect the fundamental principles of justice and peace; reflect a commitment to positive outcomes; reflect awareness of potential impact upon the future of stable and viable Israel and Palestine; and to identify affirmative investment opportunities to Israel, Gaza, East Jerusalem and the West Bank.  It also calls for the church to work through peaceful means with all affected communities to end violence and terror as well as occupation, and to work towards the creation of secure Palestinian and Israeli states.  This motion also recognizes that the problem with the security wall is its location and we support fair criticism of the security wall in so far as it illegally encroaches into Palestinian territory and recommend that the fence be relocated from land that was not part of Israel prior to 1967.  In many ways the final proposal reflected rather closely the concerns expressed by Baltimore in 2004 which led to our overture in 2006.

 

There had been hopes that the Ecclesiology Committee which was working on the PUP report would be finished Saturday night and that they would share communion as their final “piece of business.”  They went home to discern – and to wait to share the common cup until Sunday afternoon.  As you who read this on Sunday, I invite you to keep in your prayers these commissioners and all who are here – that together we might share a common cup when all has been said and done.

 

Blessings,

 

Peter

 

The Presbytery of Baltimore | 5400 Loch Raven Blvd.

Baltimore, MD 21239 | 1.800.511.0087 | 410.433.2012

Fax: 410.433.2066 | office@baltimorepresbytery.org

Letters will be sent daily during the Assembly